The Bill of Rights provides certain rights to
criminal defendants during trial. There are two fundamental aspects of the U.S.
criminal justice system: The presumption that the defendant is innocent, and
the burden on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Article
1 of the Constitution guarantees a number of other rights for those accused of
crimes. The Constitution guarantees writs of habeas corpus and prohibits bills
of attainder. Writs of habeas corpus are court orders in which a judge requires
authorities to prove that a prisoner is being held lawfully and that allow the
prisoner to be freed if the judge is not persuaded by the government’s case. Bills
of attainder are laws that declare an act illegal without a judicial trial.
The rights of criminal defendants start with the
fourth Amendment where the Constitution protects people from unreasonable
searches by the federal government. It also sets out what may not be searched
unless a warrant is issued. Over the years, the Supreme Court has interpreted
that the police can search the person being arrested, things in plain view of
the accused person and places or things that are in the arrestee’s immediate
control. The Fourth Amendment can be broken down into three sections,
first is to provide protection for a person, his home and belongings, second,
to prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures, and thirdly, warrants must
be based on probably cause and specifically described as to what must
be seized. The fourth amendment attempts to balance the concerns of
the privacy of citizens with the government’s interest in effective law
enforcement. In order for most searches a warrant must be present, which is an
order issued by a court authorizing the arrest of someone or the search of a
specific location. The fourth amendment basically protects the rights of an
individual so they are not wrongfully or illegally searched.
The Fifth Amendment imposes a number of restrictions
on the federal government with respect to the rights of persons suspected of committing
crimes. The Fifth Amendment requires indictment by a grand jury on
a federal offence unless the person is in the military and they commit a war
crime during wartime. An indictment by a grand jury means that the jurors
agree that there is sufficient reason to hold a trial. The Fifth Amendment also
gives all citizens accused of major crimes the right to have their cases
contemplated by a grand jury before being brought to trial. It also
provides protection against double jeopardy and self-incrimination. Taking
the Fifth is a short hand for exercising one’s constitutional right not to self-incriminate.
The Fifth Amendment forbids deprivation of life, liberty, or
property for public use without just compensation. That means the government
cannot throw you in jail unless you have first been taken to a fair trial and
you have been found guilty. It also means they cannot take any private
property from a person without paying them in one way or another. The right to
refuse to answer questions in any government proceeding, on the grounds of
possible self-incrimination is also included in the Fifth Amendment.
Furthermore, the Sixth Amendment guarantees to an
accused person “the Assistance of Counsel in his defense.” It also provides
that a person accused of a crime shall enjoy the rights to a speedy and public
trial by an impartial judge. It provides defendants the right to confront witnesses
against them. The notion of right to counsel has changed over time. In the
past, this provision meant only that an individual could hire an attorney to
represent him or her in court. Over time, the Supreme Court has concluded that
the state must provide an attorney to indigent defendants in felony cases. The
same way, impartiality of jury trials has undergone significant changes over
time. Historically lawyers used peremptory challenges to exclude minorities but
the Supreme Court soon ruled that these peremptory challenges to specifically
exclude a race violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment.
Lastly, The Eight Amendment prohibits “cruel and unusual
punishment.” The law “there shall not be cruel and unusual punishment” under
the eighth amendment means that society will deem what is cruel and unusual. Medieval
practices such as cutting off the hand of a thief are obviously unacceptable
forms of punishment in today’s modern society. While the death penalty is used
in some states for those who commit the most heinous of crimes, not all states
impose such a severe sentence. The Eight Amendment also prohibits
excessive bail. Defendants who are not released on bail are being denied the
opportunity to prepare their defense.
Over the years, the Supreme Court have interpreted
and applied these guarantees in an attempt to balance personal liberty and
national safety and security.
No comments:
Post a Comment